Built for behavioral health and substance use programs

    Your crisis protocol is only useful if it can be found during a crisis

    Behavioral health runs on documents that have to be right the first time and reachable in the moment — crisis and safety protocols, level-of-care criteria, consent and release forms that differ by state and by payer. The people who need them are frequently alone with a client, and the person who knows the answer is in session.

    What actually breaks

    Consent and release are not one form

    Release of information in a program that touches substance use treatment is governed differently from the rest of the chart. Staff know there is a special form. Fewer can tell you which situations trigger it, and the answer lives in a policy written for an auditor rather than for the person holding a signature pad.

    Level-of-care criteria get decided from memory

    Admission and step-down criteria are long, conditional and payer-specific. In practice a clinician recalls the shape of them and checks afterwards, which is how two clinicians in the same program end up applying different thresholds without either doing anything wrong.

    Crisis procedures are rehearsed, then revised

    The safety protocol gets updated after an event, announced in a meeting, and the version people act from is the one they learned in orientation. Nothing in the environment tells them a newer one exists at the moment they reach for it.

    The documents this covers

    • Crisis and safety protocols
    • Level-of-care and medical necessity criteria
    • 42 CFR Part 2 release and consent forms
    • State-specific telehealth consent requirements
    • Seclusion and restraint procedures
    • Discharge and step-down planning guides

    Who feels it

    • Clinical director
    • Program manager
    • Intake coordinator
    • Counselors and case managers

    Why a governed corpus matters here

    Programs that treat substance use disorder sit under 42 CFR Part 2 in addition to HIPAA, and that regime is stricter about redisclosure than most general tools were built to assume. A knowledge assistant that indexes everything a user can already reach is the wrong shape here. The right shape is a curated corpus an administrator approves, retrieval scoped to role, and a record of who was shown what.

    Questions we get asked

    Does this handle 42 CFR Part 2 material?

    The corpus is whatever your administrators approve, and retrieval is scoped by role — so Part 2 material can be restricted to the staff entitled to see it, or kept out entirely. What we do not do is claim a certification for Part 2; ask us what we actually hold and we will tell you plainly.

    Can it give clinical advice?

    No, and it should not. This answers operational questions — which form, which criteria document, what the documented escalation path is. Anything touching diagnosis or treatment selection is a different product category with a different regulatory posture, and we keep that line bright.

    Ready to Centralize Tip Sheets, Standardize Workflows & Reduce Search Time?

    30-minute demo. No slide deck. We show you the actual product with your kind of data — Epic tip sheets, clinical workflows, support resolutions. If it doesn't click, no hard feelings.

    Or email [email protected] if you prefer to skip the form.